Группа авторов "Mathematics in the Visual Arts"

132В  127

133В  128

134В  129

135В  130

136В  131

137В  132

138В  133

139В  134

140В  135

141В  136

142В  137

143В  138

144В  139

145В  140

146В  141

147В  142

148В  143

149В  144

150В  145

151В  146

152В  147

153В  148

154В  149

155В  150

156В  151

157В  152

158В  153

159В  154

160В  155

161В  156

162В  157

163В  158

164В  159

165В  160

166В  161

167В  162

168В  163

169В  164

170В  165

171В  166

172В  167

173В  168

174В  169

175В  170

176В  171

177В  172

178В  173

179В  174

180В  175

181В  177

182В 178

183В  179 (#ulink_8ac4e42b-e6df-5190-b957-b9e635aed63c)

Series Editor

Marie-Christine Maurel

Mathematics in the Visual Arts

Edited by

Ruth Scheps

Marie-Christine Maurel

First published 2020 in Great Britain and the United States by ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licenses issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address:

ISTE Ltd

27-37 St George’s Road

London SW19 4EU

UK

www.iste.co.uk (http://www.iste.co.uk)

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

111 River Street

Hoboken, NJ 07030

USA

www.wiley.com (http://www.wiley.com)

В© ISTE Ltd 2020

The rights of Ruth Scheps and Marie-Christine Maurel to be identified as the authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Library of Congress Control Number: 2020942150

British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN 978-1-78630-681-4

Introduction

The presence of mathematics in the arts has been plain since at least Pythagoras’ time. This applies as much to music (rhythm, scales and chords) as to all the visual arts, which are addressed in this book. The visual arts are also related – more and more closely – to other sciences (material, life and cultural). However, in order to get to the very roots of the connections between art and science, we felt it appropriate to choose “the queen of sciences”.

Within the mathematical sciences themselves, geometry, born from the vision of space (geometry: “measuring the Earth”), is, in this respect, the first. In the words of Max Bill: “The primary element of any plastic work is geometry, in terms of relationships between positions in the plane or the space”

(#ulink_95d9034e-21b7-51c8-89e4-0c4409220dc9). Confronted with the forms they saw in nature, the early geometrists tried to understand them by drawing them in an idealized way, that is, by modeling them. In the artists’ hands, these basic forms became the means of expression with universal scope.

Before characterizing this unquestionable presence of mathematics in the works of art in more detail, we should first note that mathematics, by its very nature, has a tendency towards plastic representations: mathematical objects, created for the purpose of translating scientific abstractions into visual terms.

Visual artists of modernity have often taken their inspiration from mathematical models, as if to delegate to them the task of speaking the unspeakable of art. Think of M.C. Escher, who exploited the riches of tiles from the hyperbolic plane, or Salvador Dali, who represented the crucified Jesus on a hypercube

(#ulink_6b56619a-30f3-5d67-84d6-44c75bcf0e5f), or the constructivist sculptors Henry Moore, Naum Gabo and Barbara Hepworth.

A certain parallelism between mathematical and artistic approaches has often been argued – and equally often rebutted. Let us therefore say at the outset what, in our view, should be excluded, and that is the quest for beauty for its own sake. If mathematics happens to be “beautiful”, this is actually a consequence of its elegance, in other words, its simplicity. As for art, it renounced beauty as a determining criterion long ago.

What seems of greater interest in this respect is the search for truth. This is, without question, the ambition of mathematics, which is wholly intellectual in nature and based on axioms that are posited as true or on accepted assumptions. This ambition is more intuitive in art: in a picture, truth is not expressed in a “thinking way”; it can be simultaneously striking and inaccessible.

The best established point of convergence between the artistic and mathematical approaches (as with other sciences) is that they turn the subject, whatever it may be, into a heuristic form; that is, they make it thoughtprovoking. Moving away from a materialistic concept of painting, can mathematics help us to discover the “spiritual software” of a work of art?